
Opening Analysis / Round 1 / Round 2 / Round 3 / Final
 |
| Niemi's finals performance will likely determine the outcome of the pool. |
The playoffs went predictably enough in the West, but not at all as expected in the East, and we are left with what should be an exciting final between Chicago and Philadelphia. Both teams haven't won in a long, long time (Chicago since 1961, Flyers since 1975); both teams have dynamic young players who were not yet born when these teams last won.
For the pool, where there was little drama in round three and only slightly more expected in the final, that's how it goes sometimes. If we all had crystal balls, then... um, insert your own punchline here.
Although there won't be too much movement at the top of the standings, there are a few scenarios that would change the results, most notably if Antti Niemi can get a shutout or two. A small battle will be Duncan Keith against Brent Seabrook, while Claude Giroux is the only Flyer in the mix. Jonathan Toews is on all contenders' entries while Patrick Kane is on all but one. Let's examine who's in the running.
If Chicago wins: Current leader Sean Hammond has the inside track should Chicago win the Cup. His is the top entry with the Hawks to win and would leapfrog Aaron Allard by five points. Coming from behind with a chance to break in are Blair Miller and Mike van Steendelaar. Starting only two points behind Aaron (with Chicago's bonus factored in), a Niemi shutout would lift them in. Blair's Niemi vs. Keith or Mike's Niemi and Giroux vs. Kane provides the most potential drama for the final round. Brendan Hoey can also make it in but would need three shutouts, not so likely to happen.
If Philadelphia wins: Aaron Allard, who has led since late in round two, should cruise to victory with his current five point margin if the Flyers win. Depending on Keith vs. Seabrook, Sean Hammond would be next and Ruth Beder would have a chance to climb into third. If Seabrook stays even with or better than Keith, Mike Melanson would hold on to second, with Sean third and leaving Ruth on the outside looking in.
| Chicago win | | | | Philadelphia win | |
| Sean Hammond | 136 (+10) | Toews, Kane, Keith | | Aaron Allard | 141 | Toews, Kane, Keith |
| Aaron Allard | 141 |
Toews, Kane, Keith |
| Sean Hammond | 136 | Toews, Kane, Keith |
| Mike van Steendelaar | 129 (+10) |
Toews, Keith, Niemi, Giroux |
| Mike Melanson | 136 | Toews, Kane, Seabrook |
| Blair Miller | 129 (+10) |
Toews, Kane, Niemi |
| Ruth Beder | 134 | Toews, Kane, Keith |
| Mike Melanson | 136 | Toews, Kane, Seabrook | | Mike van Steendelaar | 129 | Toews, Keith, Niemi, Giroux |
| Brendan Hoey | 125 (+10) | Toews, Kane, Niemi | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Marian Hossa was the subject of scorn after signing with Chicago after turning down offers by Detroit and Pittsburgh, yet he picked well and is being rewarded with a third chance in a row to win the Cup. Hossa of course lost in the finals with Pittsburgh two years ago, then jumped to Detroit and lost with them last year. Although he hasn't been the top player for the Hawks, one would think he will be extra motivated to avoid the dubious distinction of losing the finals three straight years with three different teams.
Plenty of people picked Chicago players but only one pick is present from the East: Claude Giroux. Mike van Steendelaar was the only one to do so, and with three points Giroux would pass Michael Cammalleri as the best darkhorse pick. As such Mike is the only entry with four players in the final round.
Despite my wishes I picked both Round 3 series to even up my record on the year to 7-7. For the final it's a question of which curse is more dire, Hossa's losing string or the curse of the conference trophy. Philly planned in advance to pick up the Wales trophy in spite of the curse, but they will indeed be bitten - and haunted by that Lindros Wales snub while the third time is indeed the charm for Hossa. Oh, and Chicago's better.
| Hot |
Pos. Gain (R2,R3) |
|
Hot |
Rd3 Pts. |
| Lee Beech |
78 (145,67) |
|
Lee Beech |
28 |
| Mark Fahey |
67 (101,34) |
|
Georgia Strachan |
28 |
| Georgia Strachan |
66 (79,13) |
|
Sean Smith |
24 |
| Sean Smith |
66 (150,84) |
|
Blair Miller |
23 |
| Harris Beder |
54 (101,47) |
|
Mark Fahey |
23 |
| Not |
Pos. Loss (R2,R3) |
|
Not |
Rd3 Pts. |
| 2 People: |
-49 (59,108) |
|
40 People with: |
0 |
| 4 People: |
-49 (52,101) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Top Players |
| Forwards |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
| Jonathan Toews |
CHI |
26 |
57 |
| Mike Richards |
PHI |
21 |
0 |
| Patrick Kane |
CHI |
20 |
96 |
| Michael Cammalleri |
MON |
19 |
1 |
| Sidney Crosby |
PIT |
19 |
118 |
| Daniel Briere |
PHI |
18 |
0 |
| Johan Franzen |
DET |
18 |
19 |
| Claude Giroux |
PHI |
17 |
1 |
| Joe Pavelski |
SAN |
17 |
1 |
| Patrick Sharp |
CHI |
16 |
7 |
|
| Defense |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
| Chris Pronger |
PHI |
14 |
0 |
| Dan Boyle |
SAN |
14 |
39 |
| Dennis Wideman |
BOS |
12 |
0 |
| Sergei Gonchar |
PIT |
12 |
42 |
| Goalies |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
| Antti Niemi |
CHI |
22 |
7 |
| Michael Leighton |
PHI |
15 |
0 |
| Evgeni Nabokov |
SAN |
13 |
26 |
| Marc-Andre Fleury |
PIT |
12 |
33 |
|
| Teams |
| IN |
Picks |
Cups |
| Chicago |
283 |
29 |
| Philadelphia |
1 |
0 |
|
| OUT |
Picks |
Cups |
| San Jose |
199 |
21 |
| Montreal |
6 |
1 |
|
Here are the projected scores and rankings for after
round 4. The projection assumes (wrongly, of course) that the players you
have alive will produce in round 4 at the same average rate as in the first
three rounds. Of course, if you have no players left, you will definitely have the same score as you have now!
|