
Opening Analysis / Round 1 / Round 2 / Round 3 / Final
 |
David Krejci had a standout performance in Round 1. |
After the 2012 pool when most of the pool was eliminated in the first round, it is a welcome change to have most of the pool intact for Round 2. In fact while the 2nd and 3rd seeds in both conferences went down, only Washington and Anaheim were among the top favourites (and Anaheim, in fact, had fewer Cup picks than many beneath them). The survival of Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Los Angeles and the parity among remaining teams means that there will be plenty to watch in the second round.
In total 632 player picks and 42 Cup picks were eliminated in the first round. That translates to 28% of player picks and 17% of Cup picks, with both of those numbers being in the middle of the pack compared to other pool years.
Congratulations to Samara McAdam on her first round lead with 60 points. Samara surged with 34 of these points in the last seven days, and held the lead for the last three. In contrast, Douglas Wilkinson, one of the initial leaders, had only 14 points over that same stretch. Samara can expect to stay on or near the leaderboard along with others who still have a full roster of nine players.
With most of the picks still in the game, the pool is far from over - though we will definitely see some swings as people who bet on Washington, Anaheim, and other losing teams lose ground. See whether you are projected to rise or fall, and where you would rank after round 2 if everything else were the same, in our projections below.
In contrast to last year when only two of 233 entries did not lose a player in round 1, while 26 entries were completely wiped out (both futility records), this year we are back to normal levels. Only two entries were wiped out, while forty-two entries have survived round 1 unscathed (17%). The record for most unscathed entries was set two years ago, when 108 (53%) advanced with all 9 players.
David Krejci's 13 points to lead all skaters in playoff scoring, caught many off guard - just as Claude Giroux did last year. However it has not translated into much impact in the pool thus far. Of Krejci's 6 picks, only two are in the top 50 and one, Alan Eng is in the top 10. Krejci's Boston teammate Zdeno Chara (8 pts, 24 picks) is the top defenseman while other underappreciated Bruins, Milan Lucic and Nathan Horton, have surprisingly been among the offensive leaders.
Parity in the goaltending picks this year has certainly saved a lot of people. With both Marc-Andre Fleury and Corey Crawford having 56 picks the spotlight is on them but there were question marks for goalies on nearly every team. Fleury and Crawford both had first round shutouts and their teams advanced but Fleury is now taking a back seat to Tomas Vokoun, leaving those 56 picks in limbo. In the end it was the the one goalie with no questions about his hold on the job - Rangers' Henrik Lundquist (24 picks) who surged to the top of the player stats with two straight shutouts at the end of Round 1.
After Alex Ovechkin had 13 hits but only one shot on goal in Washington's losing game 7, he said that it's ok if he doesn't score, as long as the team wins. Well in this pool, it's not ok not to score, especially if the team doesn't win. Ovie's 2 points for 96 picks were the the worst investment in the pool this year. This is assuming Jonathan Toews can get on the board in round 2 (2 pts for 178 but still in the playoffs).
Biggest busts over the years: 2013 - Ovechkin; 2012 - Luongo; 2011 - Backstrom; 2010 - Brodeur; 2009 - Nabokov; 2008 - Brodeur; 2007 - Kariya; 2006 - Lidstrom; 2004 - Brodeur; 2003 - Joseph; 2002 - Entire Flyers roster (ok ok: Roenick); 2001 - Yzerman; 2000 - Gonchar; 1999 - Yashin; 1998 - Holik.
Congratulations are always due to individuals who take daring picks that pan out. The Hindsight Award this year goes to Dave Quist for being the only one to pick Boston forward Milan Lucic, who has 9 points and counting going into round 2. Honourable mention goes to Brandon Kubis, who took Anaheim goalie Jonas Hiller - who also had 9 points but was eliminated. Other surprises include San Jose's Joe Pavelski (8 points, 2 picks), Boston's Nathan Horton (7 points, 2 picks) and of course scoring leader David Krejci (13 points, 6 picks). With all these players still alive, we may need to update this award next round.
You get some right and some wrong, and I was right and wrong in equal measure in Round 1, for a 4-4 record. For round two, I'm taking the Penguins (though cheering for those pesky Sens), Chicago, Los Angeles, and... umm... not sure between Boston and Rangers... Well goaltending is key so I'll say Rangers.
Major players on their way out: Ovechkin, Was, 96 picks; Getzlaf, Ana, 55; Green, Was, 45; Subban, Mon, 40; Backstrom, Was, 35; Perry, Ana, 32; H.Sedin, Van, 31; Kessel, Tor, 25; D.Sedin, Van, 24.
Top Players |
Forwards |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
David Krejci |
BOS |
13 |
6 |
Evgeni Malkin |
PIT |
11 |
121 |
Derick Brassard |
NYR |
9 |
0 |
Milan Lucic |
BOS |
9 |
1 |
Jarome Iginla |
PIT |
9 |
26 |
Sidney Crosby |
PIT |
9 |
115 |
Joe Pavelski |
SAN |
8 |
2 |
Logan Couture |
SAN |
8 |
13 |
Henrik Zetterberg |
DET |
8 |
18 |
4 players |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
Zdeno Chara |
BOS |
8 |
24 |
Paul Martin |
PIT |
6 |
3 |
Cody Franson |
TOR |
6 |
3 |
Francois Beauchemin |
ANA |
6 |
19 |
Erik Karlsson |
OTT |
6 |
23 |
Kris Letang |
PIT |
6 |
113 |
Goalies |
Team |
Pts |
Picks |
Henrik Lundqvist |
NYR |
14 |
24 |
Jonas Hiller |
ANA |
9 |
1 |
Jonathan Quick |
LOS |
9 |
21 |
Corey Crawford |
CHI |
9 |
56 |
|
Teams |
IN |
Picks |
Cups |
Chicago |
577 |
72 |
Pittsburgh |
545 |
94 |
Los Angeles |
136 |
9 |
Boston |
95 |
11 |
NY Rangers |
90 |
9 |
Detroit |
61 |
5 |
Ottawa |
44 |
2 |
San Jose |
43 |
3 |
|
OUT |
Picks |
Cups |
Washington |
205 |
13 |
Anaheim |
124 |
4 |
Toronto |
90 |
0 |
Montreal |
85 |
7 |
Vancouver |
78 |
6 |
St. Louis |
38 |
3 |
NY Islanders |
11 |
0 |
Minnesota |
1 |
0 |
|
Here are the projected scores and rankings for after round
2. The projection assumes (wrongly, of course) that the remaining players will produce in round 2 at the exact same rate as in round 1. For example, Brodeur would get another 11 points while Shea Weber would only get 2.
LOST=Players Lost in Round 1
IMP=Impact (pts. by lost players)
IMP%=Impact as % of total pts.
|